Component Design & Material References
These sources support general process and material understanding. They do not confirm SINTS supplier relationships, the grade of a pictured part or project qualification.
Metal Injection Molding
MIM combines molding, binder removal and sintering. An integrated shape still needs a review of the complete process and any final operations required by its drawing. This is why product pages distinguish forming the body from finishing critical interfaces.
BASF: MIM process overview →Conventional Powder Metallurgy
Conventional press-and-sinter production starts with compacting powder and then sintering the part. Material, shape, tooling and subsequent operations need to be considered together. A powder metal label alone does not define the tolerance, strength or final inspection requirements of a component.
EPMA: conventional press and sinter →Stainless Steel and Service Conditions
Stainless steel selection depends on the environment and surface condition, not only the alloy name. Cleaning, contamination and component design can influence corrosion behavior. A material record, the final finish and project-specific acceptance requirements should therefore be considered together.
Outokumpu: corrosion resistance →Where MIM and PM Material Specifications Come From
Material requirements for powder metallurgy and metal injection molding are published through recognised standards bodies rather than agreed supplier by supplier. This matters most at quotation stage, when two parties may use the same shorthand for different materials. Naming the standard and the grade together removes that ambiguity.
- MPIF Standard 35-MIM — Materials Standards for Metal Injection Molded Parts
Publishes mechanical and physical property data for the common MIM material families. Note that MPIF Standard 35 is a series issued for different product families — structural parts, self-lubricating bearings, powder forged parts and metal injection moulded parts — so the correct volume has to be cited. - ASTM B883-24 — Standard Specification for Metal Injection Molded (MIM) Ferrous Materials
The standard specification covering metal injection moulded ferrous materials. It applies to ferrous materials; non-ferrous and specialty grades are covered elsewhere. - ISO 5755:2022 — Sintered metal materials, specifications
The current edition of the international standard covering sintered metal material specifications more broadly, including press-and-sinter materials. - UNS numbers
Ferrous grades carry Unified Numbering System identifiers that make a specification unambiguous. 316L is UNS S31603 and 17-4PH is UNS S17400. Where a drawing names a grade, adding the UNS number prevents the common failure of two parties meaning different materials.
Design Guidance and Process Selection
Process selection guidance for powder metallurgy and MIM is published by industry associations, and reading it before a drawing is released is usually cheaper than discovering a constraint during tooling. The guidance is generic by design — it describes what a process family can and cannot do — so it informs the review rather than replacing it.
- EPMA (European Powder Metallurgy Association)
Publishes process descriptions, design guidance and material information for conventional press-and-sinter, metal injection molding and related powder routes. The conventional press-and-sinter process page is a useful starting point for understanding compaction and sintering as a sequence. - MPIF
In addition to the Standard 35 series, MPIF publishes design and material guidance for the powder metallurgy industry, including material designations used across the sector. - What guidance cannot do
No published guideline tells you whether a specific part at a specific annual volume will be economical on a specific route. That depends on geometry, tolerance structure, material, finishing and volume together, which is why the review stays part-specific.
Tolerance, Density and Finishing
Three properties decide most of the economics of a sintered part, and each behaves differently from its machining equivalent.
- As-sintered tolerance scales with the dimension.
A percentage tolerance applied across a part produces a large absolute value on a long dimension and a very small one on a short feature. Reading a drawing feature by feature is therefore necessary, and features that need tighter control are normally machined after sintering. - Density is a process characteristic, not a material constant.
Sintered density affects strength, hardness, wear behaviour, magnetic properties and how the part responds to heat treatment. It has to be characterised for the specific material and process route, then verified on first articles rather than assumed from a material name. - Near-net-shape is not net-shape.
Depending on the drawing, parts may still need de-burring, machining of critical bores or threads, heat treatment, tumbling, passivation, plating or coating. The objective is the shortest qualified route, not the fewest operations.
Corrosion and Service Conditions in More Detail
Corrosion resistance is a system property rather than a grade property. Alloy selection sets the starting point, but surface condition, contamination, crevices, the cleaning method and contact with other metals all influence the outcome. For stainless components this means the material record, the final finish and the project-specific acceptance requirements are usually reviewed together rather than independently. Where a part is exposed to cleaning agents, washdown or a specific medium, that exposure belongs in the request so the finish and the material can be assessed against it.
BSSA: British Stainless Steel Association →From General Guidance to Your Drawing
The product pages identify interfaces and questions for engineering review. Please provide the component drawing, mating arrangement, material requirements, expected quantity and acceptance criteria so the proposal can address the actual project.
Request a Drawing Review →